Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Kelsh
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1987No. 86 Civ. 6473 (EW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
664 F.Supp. 162 (1987)
Ponell JOHNSON, Plaintiff,
v.
Peter KELSH, and James Martin, Fire Marshall, Defendants.
No. 86 Civ. 6473 (EW).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
July 14, 1987.
Ponell Johnson, pro se.
Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of State of N.Y., New York City for defendants; Gerald J. Ryan, Jay B. Damashek, Asst. Attys. Gen., of counsel.
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ponell Johnson, has brought this pro se action for unspecified damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,[1] against Peter Kelsh, a New York City Parole Officer, and James Martin, a New York City Fire Marshall.[2] The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Quartararo v. CattersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Marshall v. N.Y. State Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Miller v. GarrettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.