Raymond v. Lane Construction Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.
The Court denies Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court, finding that the Defendant has demonstrated that the amount in controversy, including attorney’s fees, meets the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold for diversity jurisdiction.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 19, 2007, Cindy Raymond filed a law suit in Maine Superior Court against The Lane Construction Corporation (Lane Construction), alleging a violation of the Maine Human Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 4551 et seq., and the Maine Whistleblowers’…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Coventry Sewage Associates v. Dworkin Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Youtsey v. Avibank Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Baker v. Equity Residential Management, L.L.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Feller v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- Tres Lotes LLC v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Charvat v. NMP, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.