Legal Opinion

Sadanobu Chikusa v. American Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1953No. 32476PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action on a robbery, burglary and theft policy, for loss by burglary. The only question involved is whether the loss was covered by the terms of the policy.

Item 1 of the policy stated:

“(a) Name of Insured Sadanobu Chikusa, d/b/a Bo’s Rainier Market.(b) Insured’s Mailing Address 2201 Rainier Avenue Seattle, Washington(c) Location of building containing the premises As above(d) Business conducted in premises by Insured Market.”

The policy covered: (1) Insured property while in the care and custody of a messenger outside the premises (Amount,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prussian National Insurance v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Jetzinger v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  4. Violette v. Queen InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API