Cigali v. Kaplan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, by rule, submitted to the court below the question of his right to a judgment on the petition and answer (which proceeding is authorized by Act 157 of 1912, as amended) and recovered judgment as prayed for in the petition, from which defendant has appealed.
The suit is predicated on a promissory note for $300.00; defendant admits its execution, but pleads that his indebtedness thereon is extinguished by compensation. The sole question presented is whether the plea is set forth with such particularity and precision as would permit the introduction of evidence to prove it.
It is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Busby v. ChildressLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Robert v. Blythe Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bloomenstiel v. McKeithenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. MaricelliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Snyder v. WhitemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Campbell v. ClarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cigali v. KaplanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Taylor v. RileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.