Legal Opinion

Baker v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1929No. 16077Published

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, O.

Prom the brief of plaintiff in error, it appears that this was a suit upon a promissory note in the sum of $2,000, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given as security therefor. Plaintiff alleges that she purchased from the Conservative Loan Company said note and mortgage for value before maturity and became a holder in due course. The defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the note for a good and valuable consideration to the Conservative Loan Company, original payee, but denied that plaintiff was the owner of the paper, or that she was a bona fide holder for value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. CoatneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Wimmer v. State Ex Rel. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Take v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API