Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Sternheim

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

In this case there was a trial before the circuit court by agreement, without a jury. No written propositions to be held as law by the court in the decision of the case were submitted to the court, as required by section 42 of the Practice act. Hence, no question of law is presented by the record for our determination. (Hall v. Cox, 144 Ill. 532; Waldron v. Alexander, 136 id. 550; Belleville Savings Bank v. Bornman, 124 id. 200; Hobbs v. Ferguson, 100 id. 232.) No error is complained of as having been committed by the trial court in the admission or exclusion of evidence. It follows that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. Jacobson v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Higdon v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API