Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1932No. 8903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

The statement of the case as made by ap-pellees is adopted:

“The appellee Dewey Hall brought suit No. 8430 in the Ninety-Third district court of Hidalgo county to recover for services rendered under a certain contract with the Planters’ Gin Company and H. R. Sharp, defendants therein and in which other defQnd-ants were joined because of their secondary liability as officers and stockholders of the defendant Planters’ Gin Company. Among other defendants, M. L. Paden, here in question, was sued as either a stockholder or a director of the corporation which had become defunct. Issue was joined in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dunn v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Watts v. OverstreetTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Harrison v. McMurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. McManus v. Cash & LuckelTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Aetna Ins. Co. v. DancerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollis v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Grimes v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Sorsby v. RussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Sorsby v. RussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API