Legal Opinion

Venn v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided October 25, 1994No. Civ. A. 89-30035/LACPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; AND MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

COLLIER, District Judge.

Defendant has moved for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative, new trial, or in the alternative, to alter or amend the judgment. The question has been briefed exhaustively by both parties. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the relevant authority, the Court concludes that Defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, or to a new trial, or to alter or amend the judgment.

I. Background,

The history of this case goes back…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  2. Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Kerr Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,478 Howard W. Jones, Trustee in Bankruptcy for James Steven Boyd, Teresa Irene Boyd v. Kelly HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venn v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Sommers Co. v. Bell (In Re Bell)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API