Legal Opinion

In Re Curl v. Putman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1970No. 8 Div. 267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

L. D. Curl filed a detinue suit in statutory form against D. L. Putman. — § 223.-(27), Title 7, Code 1940. Putman filed a verified written motion to transfer the suit to equity. — § 153, Title 13, Code 1940. Pursuant to said § 153, supra, Curl demurred to the motion to test its sufficiency and later, without waiving his demurrer, filed a contraverting affidavit. After a hearing, without ruling on Curl’s demurrer, the trial judge, the Honorable David R. Archer, granted Putman’s motion to transfer the detinue suit to the equity docket.

Curl then filed in this court an original…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ballentine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Ex Parte HolzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Preuit v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Ex parte PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Ex Parte Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W & H MacHine & Tool Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API