Legal Opinion

State v. Bly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1906No. Nos. 14,748—(26)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Dickinson, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and conviction of the crime of abortion.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Appellant was convicted under the following indictment, and the first point urged is that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense:

Theron H. Bly is accused by the grand jury of the county of Hennepin, in the state of Minnesota, by this indictment,, of the crime of abortion, committed as follows: The said Theron H. Bly on the sixth day of December, A. D. 1904, at the city of Minneapolis, in said Hennepin cpunty, then and there being, did wilfully, unlawfully, wrongfully, knowingly, and feloniously, and with the intent to produce the miscarriage of a woman,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Cochran v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. State v. WellsUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. DeGroatSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. State v. LongstrethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. GaulWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API