Legal Opinion

England v. England

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 2018No. 2017–CA–0493; NO. 2017–CA–0498PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART, DISSENTS IN PART, AND ASSIGNS REASONS.

LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART, DISSENTS IN PART, AND ASSIGNS REASONS.

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority opinion. I concur in the majority's affirmation of the district court's award of sole custody to Mr. England and supervised visitation to Ms. England. I write separately as to that affirmation, however, to provide reasons why the burden of proof set forth in Bergeron v. Bergeron1 was improperly applied to an emergency temporary allocation of custody time under La. C.C.P. art 3945.

I dissent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. Griffith v. LatiolaisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. England v. EnglandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API