Legal Opinion
In re Riedy
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 24, 2014No. 14-05631-jtgPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY
JOHN T. GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a Motion to Continue the Stay [Dkt. No. 6] (the “Motion”) filed by Daniel C. Riedy (the “Debtor”) in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth below, the court shall grant the Motion.
JURISDICTION
The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a) and 157(a). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (G).
BACKGROUND
A.Initial Bankruptcy Filing
On October 23, 2012, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 with this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Isaac and Jacqueline Okoreeh-Baah, Metro Employees Credit Union v. Isaac and Jacqueline Okoreeh-BaahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Nan Beth Alt, Debtor. Nan Beth Alt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Hardin v. Caldwell (In re Caldwell)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In Re BaldassaroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Schleicher & Stebbins Hotels, L. L.C.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2019
- In re HagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re MarkochUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
- Charles Gary Blankenship, IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Charles Gary Blankenship, IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.