Legal Opinion

In re the Succession of Hymel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1989No. 89-CA-89PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Judge.

This is an appeal by Victoria Hymel from a judgment setting aside a clause in her late husband’s will which purported to disinherit Tanya Hymel Manslank, his daughter by a previous marriage. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The testator, Edward Daniel Hymel died on December 31,1983. A clause in his will recited that he disinherited his daughter Tanya because she had never in her life visited or spoken to him. At trial the testimony showed that the decedent divorced Tanya’s mother in 1954, when she was five months pregnant with the child. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Succession of LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Succession of LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Succession of NetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API