Legal Opinion

State v. Hurds

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Bill op exceptions from Dodge county, Post, J., presiding ; filed by the district attorney under the provisions of sec. 515, criminal code.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This is a proceeding in error by the district attorney of the fourth judicial district under the provisions of section •514 et seq., of the criminal code, for the purpose of having the law of the case determined by this court.

The defendant was indicted for selling mortgaged personal property, The charging part of the indictment, after reciting the execution of the mortgage, is, that the defendant, “ during the existence of the lien created by said mortgage, did unlawfully, fraudulently and feloniously, and without the consent of the said Seymour, Sabin & Co., the mortgagee, sell and transfer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Harrington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ex parte ThomasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  5. McNamee v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wheeler v. StuhtNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Singleton v. Van DuynNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Bryant v. Dakota CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API