Legal Opinion
Chery v. Castello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 2, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse for her failure to oppose the motion of the defendant Ronnie Thornton for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her (see CFLR 5015 [a] [1]; Political Mktg., Int’l, Inc. v Jaliman, 67 AD3d 661 [2009]; cf. Felder v New York City Tr. Auth., 238 AD2d 543 [1997]; Krystofic v Rapisardi, 112 AD2d 196, 196-197 [1985]). The plaintiff also “established the existence of a triable issue of fact constituting a meritorious opposition to” Thornton’s motion (Political Mktg., Int’l., Inc. v Jali*521man, 67 AD3d at 662; see CPLR 5015…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dixon v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Political Marketing International, Inc. v. JalimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Abdelaziz v. FazelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Felder v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santos v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ambrose v. Palmo Bus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ambrose v. Palmo Bus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Santos v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013