Roncal v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
In these consolidated actions arising out of an intersectional collision between two automobiles, the lower court denied the demands of each plaintiff, Ms. Roncal and her gentleman friend, Brasher, who were the sole occupants of Brasher’s car.
The issues which plaintiffs raise are factually unique:
—which plaintiff was driving the Brasher car?
—on which street were the two automobiles being driven?
—were either or both Ms. Roncal and Brasher intoxicated, and if so, with what legal effect on each of them with respect to recovery? and
*26—did the law authorize, before the amendment of CCP…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prestenbach v. Sentry Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Emerson Electric Co. v. Guy F. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Tillman v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Breithaupt v. SellersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- DeVillier v. Highlands Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Mizell v. State, Through La. Dept. of Hwys.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Elliott v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Florent v. FlorentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.