Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Ragsdale

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1892No. 538PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

To the complaint of the appellee against the appellant, a demurrer for want of sufficient facts was overruled. The complaint alleged, in substance, that on, etc., the appellee purchased of the appellant a certain jack, then owned by- the .appellant, for the price of three hundred dollars, and paid the appellant that amount by delivering to him certain chattels described, valued by the parties at the time at the sum of three hundred dollars; that at the time of the purchase the appellee represented to the appellant “that he desired said jack for breeding purposes, and intended making the…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Third National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lams v. F. H. Smith Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API