Legal Opinion

Brown v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlakksoN, J.

Tbe main contentions of defendants were to tbe effect tbat tbe court below did not give instructions prayed for by tbe defendants. That tbe charge impinged and did not comply with O. S., 564. To comply with tbe statute, it is incumbent on tbe judge in tbe charge to tbe jury tbat be express no opinion as to whether a fact is fully or sufficiently proven — tbat is tbe province of tbe jury. It is further required tbat tbe judge shall state in a plain and correct manner tbe evidence and declare and explain tbe law applicable to tbe facts. It is also well settled tbat requests for instructions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Bullock v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Bullock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Strother v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API