State v. Brown
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,814 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. QUORTEZ E. BROWN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A defendant cannot use a motion to correct an illegal sentence to raise a constitutional claim. 2. Courts are to interpret pro se pleadings based on their contents and not solely on their title or labels. But there are limits to a court's duty to liberally construe pro se pleadings; a court need not divine every conceivable interpretation of a motion, especially when a movant repeatedly asserts specific statutory grounds for relief and propounds arguments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. Quartez BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. ReddingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.