Legal Opinion

People v. Holliman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 23, 1974No. 72-331PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In separate jury verdicts, defendant was found guilty of both the possession of and the sale of heroin in violation of section 3 of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, §22 — 3). He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 2 to 6 years on each count. On appeal defendant contends that (1) the eavesdropping statute is unconstitutional; (2) the testimony of the law enforcement officers concerning his conversations with the informer were improperly admitted into evidence; (3) the testimony of the law…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SwimleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. People v. TobiasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. NanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API