People v. Holliman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
In separate jury verdicts, defendant was found guilty of both the possession of and the sale of heroin in violation of section 3 of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, §22 — 3). He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 2 to 6 years on each count. On appeal defendant contends that (1) the eavesdropping statute is unconstitutional; (2) the testimony of the law enforcement officers concerning his conversations with the informer were improperly admitted into evidence; (3) the testimony of the law…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. SwimleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. TobiasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. NanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.