City of New York v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.
New York Supreme Court
Dbmuííber to complaint on the ground that it does not •state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The action is to recover 5 per cent of the defendant’s receipts for six years last past from the display advertising matter in its stages, and defendant demurs. The only question argued is whether moneys received by the defendant from the leasing of space in its stages for advertising purposes are receipts from the operation of its routes within the meaning of the statute (Trans. Corp. Law, § 23), and hence subject to the license fee of 5 per cent per annum upon gross receipts from such operation required to be paid to the city by the statute. It seems to me that the answer to the question is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayor of New York v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. Robert R. Sizer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of New York v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933