Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Creechley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1904No. 1502Published

Appeal from the Second District Court, Morgan County. — How. T. Marioneaux, Judge.

1DissentMcCARTY, J.

I am unable to concur with my Brethren in the foregoing opinion. The appeal in this case is taken solely on the judgment roll. There being no bill of exceptions, the evidence is not before us.

The information, in part, charges that “the said Moses Creechley, on the second day of July, A. D. 1902, at the county of Morgan, State of Utah, . . . did then and there take an oath before the said Honorable H. H. Rolapp, judge as aforesaid, that certain testimony then and there given by him, the said Moses Creechley, in behalf of the defendant Moses Creechley in an action then and there on trial before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Vowells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. George v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. PaternoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API