Legal Opinion
Pareti v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1988No. 87-CA-425PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WICKER, Judge.
This appeal arises from a lawsuit for damages filed on behalf of Mary Pareti and Paul Pareti, III against Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (erroneously referred to as General Accident Insurance Company), Pennsylvania’s insureds, Edward J. Schneller and his wife Mrs. Edward J. Schneller, and plaintiffs’ uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier, Sentry Indemnity Company (Sentry). After Sentry filed a third party action against the Schnellers, the Schnellers sought a defense from Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, however, had settled the main demand, exhausting its policy limits.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Home Assurance Company v. CzarnieckiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Carney v. American Fire & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Gross v. Lloyds of London InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- St. John's Home v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Pareti v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988