Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2018No. 17-6034/6079Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LARSEN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.1

State courts are the authority on questions of state law. Federal courts must sometimes decide state law questions, but we are the back-ups. We are to follow, not lead.

This case presents two uncertain and important questions of state law: one concerning the proper construction of a Tennessee statute; the other concerning the conformity of a different Tennessee statute with the Tennessee Constitution. The Tennessee Supreme Court has signaled its willingness to decide both of these state law questions, and we have a…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API