Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1933Published

1Dissent

Finch, P. J. (dissenting).

Since the amendment of the Constitution in effect January 1, 1924, such legislation as is here under consideration, affecting cities of the first class, would be clearly unconstitutional. As pointed out by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Mayor, etc., of New York (Elm Street) (246 N. Y. 72): “ Up to that time, the distinction between special or local laws on the one hand and general laws on the other was directed to the form of the enactment rather than to its substance. If the act by its terms was applicable to a class, it did not cease to be general though the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. In the Matter of the Application of ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Matter of HennebergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New York (Elm St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Matter of City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API