Legal Opinion

Middlebranch Realty Co. v. Henderson

Baltimore City Superior Court

Decided November 10, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtSolter, J.

This is a petition for the removal of an attachment and short note ease from this Court to the Federal Court. The application is resisted by the plaintiff upon the ground that it has not been made in time under the United States statutes authorizing such removals. The rule is that the defendant must make and file Iris petition for removal in the State Court at or before the time he is required by the laws of the State or the rules of the Court in which the suit is brought, to answer or plead to the declaration or complaint of the plaintiff. It lias always been held that this means before the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Hatcher v. Hendrie & Bolthoff Mfg. & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Coward v. DillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Western National Bank v. National Union BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Cromwell v. Royal Canadian InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API