Lucot v. Rodgers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 109, Oct. T., 1893, by defendant, Michael Rodgers, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1891, No. 726, on verdict for plaintiff, Eugene Lucot. Trespass for injuries to retaining wall and house. The court charged in part as follows, by Slagle, J. “ Mr. Lucot owned a lot of ground fronting 60 feet on Elliott street, in the Thirty-sixth ward of the city of Pittsburgh, and running back towards Steuben street, a distance of 50 feet.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 109, Oct. T., 1893, by defendant, Michael Rodgers, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1891, No. 726, on verdict for plaintiff, Eugene Lucot. Trespass for injuries to retaining wall and house. The court charged in part as follows, by Slagle, J. “ Mr. Lucot owned a lot of ground fronting 60 feet on Elliott street, in the Thirty-sixth ward of the city of Pittsburgh, and running back towards Steuben street, a distance of 50 feet. This lot and the street itself are on a hillside. Long before Mr. Lucot owned the property a wall had been built along the line of his…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,. The charge of the learned trial judge is so full and accurate that further discussion of the questions of law involved in this case is unnecessary.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bigham v. Wabash-Pittsburg Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Hershey v. H. S. Kerbaugh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Welliver v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Trimmer v. BerkheimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Cameron, Joyce & Co. v. McLouthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.