Beard v. Pritchard

The defendant is appellant from a judgment which makes her liable for, and condemns her to pay the amount of an open account for work and services heretofore due to the partnership of Dakin & Dakin, subsequently transferred and assigned by their syndic to the plaintiff.

The only evidence upon which the judgment complained of was rendered, is the testimony of James Dakin, one of the firm fo Dakin & Dakin, who, according to the statement of facts *465signed by the counsel on both sides, is admitted to have proved that the work was done as detailed in the account; that the prices affixed thereto were…