Legal Opinion

Buckins v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 9, 2021No. 3:19-cv-07969Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 DARRELL BUCKINS, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 19-07969 WHA 12 v. 13 DEPUTY SANCHEZ, et. al., ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this Section 1983 action for unconstitutional punishment and retaliation by San 18 Francisco County Sheriff personnel, defendants move for summary judgment. For the below 19 reasons, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 20 STATEMENT 21 In 2015, plaintiff Darrell Buckins suffered bilateral tibial plateau fractures, and injured his 22 back and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API