Legal Opinion

Mathieu v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1991No. C1-91-49PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FACTS

LANSING, Judge.

Mary Mathieu brought a negligence action against Katherine Freeman and others for injuries she suffered in an automobile collision. After a nonbinding arbitration hearing, Freeman sent Mathieu a $25,000 settlement offer that referred to Minn. R.Civ.P. 68 but did not mention whether the proposal included costs and disbursements. Mathieu did not respond to Free man’s offer, and the case was tried to a jury. The trial court entered judgment on the $18,009 jury verdict for Mathieu but denied costs and disbursements. Mathieu appeals.

ISSUE

Does a settlement offer that invokes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Staples v. WickesbergDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
  3. Everson v. KappermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. David v. AM InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Kusniryk v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hallow v. FiliyaroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Olson v. NuszlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API