Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided June 26, 1961No. Claim No. 35792; Claim No. 37796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Easton, J.

On March 25,1958, for purposes connected with the Niagara Power Project in the Niagara Falls area, the State of New York, on behalf of its Power Authority, *869appropriated in fee 105.864 acres of claimants’ lands. Prior to the taking, claimants’ premises consisted of 107.889 acres. Claimants’ remaining 2.025 acres were landlocked as result of the appropriation.

The issues here are typical to those frequently raised in subdivision property cases.

The only thing especially significant about this case, or different, from other potential subdivision cases, is the treatment of some of the claimants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Hewitt v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960
  4. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. Hewitt v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API