Legal Opinion

Cold Spring Granite Co. Inc. v. Jacobson Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1929No. 27,519Published

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant partnership, general contractors at Duluth, Minnesota, had a contract for building a cathedral at Superior, Wisconsin. Plaintiff, operating a granite quarry at Cold Spring, Minne sota, had a subcontract with defendant for furnishing all the granite necessary for the construction of the building for the sum of $21,000. The complaint was on two causes of action, with the first of which only we are concerned, as the answer admitted the second. The answer contained a counterclaim, which the court properly took from the consideration of the jury. The complaint declared on an account…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Galson v. GalsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Behrens v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Kenyon Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API