State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentWiggins, Justice
There is no majority opinion in our resolution of this case today, and therefore *33there remains no decision from this court holding the right to counsel under article I, section 10 of the Iowa Constitution attaches only upon the filing of a criminal complaint.22 Because the plurality and concurring opinions combine to affirm John Arthur Senn Jr.’s conviction, however, I dissent. I would hold Senn’s right to counsel under article I, section 10 of the Iowa Constitution was violated when the State arrested him on suspicion of operating while intoxicated,'invoked the statutory implied-consent…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.