Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 2016No. 15–0624Published

1DissentWiggins, Justice

There is no majority opinion in our resolution of this case today, and therefore *33there remains no decision from this court holding the right to counsel under article I, section 10 of the Iowa Constitution attaches only upon the filing of a criminal complaint.22 Because the plurality and concurring opinions combine to affirm John Arthur Senn Jr.’s conviction, however, I dissent. I would hold Senn’s right to counsel under article I, section 10 of the Iowa Constitution was violated when the State arrested him on suspicion of operating while intoxicated,'invoked the statutory implied-consent…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API