Legal Opinion
Pathfinder Mines Corp. v. Clark
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 1, 1985No. Civ 84-105 PHX PGRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this action, Pathfinder Mines Corporation, is a mining company that has filed 22 mining claims within the boundaries of the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve (hereinafter Game Preserve). Those mining claims were declared void ab initio by the Chief of the Branch of Lands and Mineral Operations, Arizona Office of the Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior. That decision was affirmed by the Interior Board of Land Appeals of the Department of the Interior (hereinafter IBLA). That body replaced the Director of the Bureau…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maxwell Kadel v. Dale FolwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Pathfinder Mines Corp. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sierra Club-Black Hills Group v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Clawson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Pathfinder Mines Corporation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.