Legal Opinion

Rosner v. Textile Binding & Trimming Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is by tenants of commercial space, to recover damages under the emergency Commercial Rent Law, based on the landlord’s leasing premises to a third person after the tenants vacated therefrom. In the first cause of action the tenant seeks damages under the emergency rent law and in the second cause upon fraud and deceit. Both causes are predicated upon the allegation that the landlord had notified the tenant, both verbally and in writing, before the expiration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sno-Wite, Inc. v. Gerald Operating Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Joanette Juniors, Inc. v. Board of Home Missions of Congregational & Christian ChurchesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Kinsch v. A. Flohr Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosner v. Textile Binding & Trimming Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API