Legal Opinion

Carrasquillo v. Richardson

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendants Henry and Pamela Richardson have appealed the denial of their motion to amend the judgment entered against them in this motor vehicle tort case.

The complaint alleged that defendant Henry Richardson so negligently operated his vehicle that he caused it to collide with the automobile operated by plaintiff Luz Carrasquillo. The plaintiff sought damages for loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, and medical expenses “in excess of Two Thousand ($2000.00) Dollars.” The defendants’ answer set forth seven affirmative defenses, including the assertion that they were “exempt from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY v. United States Post OfficeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Distefano v. JovetMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API