Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Gettes
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 14, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*791OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated November 4, 1999 affirmed, with $10 costs.
We agree that tenants’ building contained six “housing accommodations” on the applicable base date and, in consequence, their apartments continue to remain subject to the Rent Stabilization Law and Code (Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2520.11 [d]). The building consists of five stories, with one apartment on each, plus a cellar apartment. Pursuant to a 1962 Board of Standards and Appeals resolution, “the cellar apartment shall be occupied by the superintendent of the building only.” It is not disputed that the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Salvati v. EimickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gracecor Realty Co. v. HargroveNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Shubert v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gottlieb v. MirabalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4Cited by1 opinion
- Balay v. Manhattan 140 LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022