Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. University of Arkansas Medical Sciences

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1981No. 81-57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

By this appeal we are asked to construe Act 259 of 1959, the Medical Quota Act, as directing the University of Arkansas for Medical Services to adopt standards for determining medical indigency based on the patient’s ability to pay and which follow national and local poverty guidelines. Appellant contends that the Medical Quota Act mandates such standards. We find no provision in the act sustaining that contention.

In December of 1976 appellant’s minor daughter became a patient at UAMS for obstetrical care. The putative father agreed to pay the costs and signed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TrulockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hackelton v. MalloySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Sanders v. WheatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Colvin Properties, LLC v. Paul Colvin, Jr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Colvin, Sr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
  4. Hackelton v. MalloySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API