Hill v. Dealers Supply Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
We first turn our attention to the question as to whether the trial court correctly sustained the general and special demurrers to the plaintiff’s petition. The defendant Hill contends that there must be sufficient allegations in the petition to show there existed between the contractor and the owner of the property improved a specific type of contract or general account which would constitute all of the sales set out in the plaintiff’s Exhibit “A” as one single transaction. The petition alleges that the petitioner furnished ■ the building material as shown by the exhibit to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prince v. Neal-Millard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Tuck v. Moss Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Marshall v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Pippin v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Lumber Fabricators, Inc. v. GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Superior Rigging & Erecting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Levy v. GEC CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Bennett Iron Works, Inc. v. Underground Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Columbus Square Shopping Center Co. v. B & H Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- CHAMBERS LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.