O'Connor v. Deputy Commissioner & Comptroller of Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
The petitioner, a retired Deputy Commissioner of Banks, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to certify that the petitioner is entitled to receive $1,218.01 for “vacation allowance” pursuant to Rule LV-8 of the “Rules and Regulations Governing Vacation Leave,” which are authorized by G. L. c. 7, § 28, as amended through St. 1963,.c. 352. The respondent appealed from the order of the trial judge that a writ of mandamus issue. The evidence is reported.
We note at the outset that “[i]t is an elementary principle that mandamus will not lie where there is available another and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daly v. Mayor of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- SISTERS OF HOLY CROSS OF MASSACHUSETTS v. BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Madden v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Seney v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McCarthy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Church of Christ v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Mitchell v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Department of Public Welfare v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966