Legal Opinion

Medina v. Peralta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 2001No. Nos. 3D00-2315, 3D00-2110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, J.

The defendants appeal from an adverse jury verdict in a personal injury case after the trial court directed a verdict on the permanency of the plaintiffs injuries. Because there was substantial conflict in the evidence regarding the plaintiffs injuries, we reverse.

On April 8, 1990, David Peralta was injured in an automobile accident with a vehicle driven by Jorge Perez and owned by Anderson Medina. Peralta has under-insured motorist coverage with Allstate. Medina and Perez are also insured by Allstate. (Hereafter, Medina, Perez, and Allstate will be collectively referred to as “defendants”).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. McElroy v. PerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Evans v. MontenegroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Blaustein v. Commodore Cruise Line, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY v. KEISHA GUYTONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  2. Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Odaima Garcia, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  3. Smith Terminal Warehouse Co. v. FragaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API