Legal Opinion

Price v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by William R. Rose, as Receiver of the copartnership of B. L. Price & Co., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of July, 1897, declaring that his appointment as temporary receiver of the plaintiff and ■defendant as copartners was superseded by the appointment of William M. Lawrence as receiver of the property of the plaintiff and defendant as judgment…

Read the full summary

Appeal by William R. Rose, as Receiver of the copartnership of B. L. Price & Co., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of July, 1897, declaring that his appointment as temporary receiver of the plaintiff and ■defendant as copartners was superseded by the appointment of William M. Lawrence as receiver of the property of the plaintiff and defendant as judgment debtors, and directing him to turn over to said Lawrence, as such receiver, all the property which came into his custody, to…

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

This action was brought in October, 1896, for the dissolution of the firm of B. L. Price & Co., composed of the plaintiff and the defendant, and for the appointment of a receiver of all the partnership assets. Upon the complaint and affidavit, and with the con*598sent of the defendant, an order was entered appointing the appellant, William R. Rose, temporary receiver of all the partnership assets, and Mr. Rose entered upon the duties of his trust. On the 21st of November, 1896, J. L. Baily & Co. duly recovered a judgment against B. L. Price & Co., and issued an execution to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schloss v. SchlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PriceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. Howell v. German Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API