P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
The Appellant, P.S. (the child), by her next friend, filed a complaint for permanent injunctive and declaratory relief against the Appellees, W.S. and P.S. (parents), who were planning to have her sterilized. The trial court granted a temporary restraining order with extensions, but, after a consolidated hearing on the merits of the preliminary and permanent injunctions pursuant to Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 65(A)(2), refused to grant a permanent injunction. This Court stayed the trial court’s order pending appeal.
We reverse.
The child presented a number of issues for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- V.S.D. v. Williams-HustonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ps by Harbin v. WsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Ps by Harbin v. WsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982