State v. Wilford
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant, the State of Florida, appeals the trial judge’s decision to apply 40 points for sexual contact rather than 80 points for sexual penetration on appellee’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet. We affirm.
First, we note that because a factual determination by the trial judge is at issue in this case, the correct standard of review is whether the decision is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 9.6 (1997); Dwight v. State, 677 So.2d 1363, 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
The State cites McClendon v. State, 679 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Karchesky v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Burrows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- McClendon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. WestonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- William Greene v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016