Wilson v. McCrory

Action for slander; judgment for the sum of $75 in favor of the plaintiff, the appellee. The appellant claims that the court erred in overruling his demurrer for want of facts to the second, ninth and tenth paragraphs of the complaint, and in sustaining the motion of the appellee to strike out certain paragraphs of answer. No question is presented upon the latter ruling, because the answers which were stricken out are not made a part of the record. Berlin v. Oglesbee, 65 Ind. 308.

The objection made to the second paragraph of the complaint is that it is ambiguous in respect to the person…