Legal Opinion

Hoholik v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1939No. Docket No. 94, Calendar No. 40,451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff is tbe beneficiary of a fife insurance policy issued to ber husband, Paul M. Hobo lik. The policy was in the amount of $2,000 and contained the so-called “double indemnity” provision providing for the payment of an additional $2,000 in case of accidental death. The policy became effective July 1, 1936, and on the afternoon of July 3, 1936, the insured’s body was found in Lake Calhoun in the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The policy contained the following clause:

“5. Suicide: If the insured, within two years from the date of issue hereof, die by his own hand or act, whether sane or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schneider v. C. H. Little Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guberman v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Haman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McNaught v. New York Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Donald Vroman, a Minor, by James R. Vroman, His Next Friend v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. And George D. Roper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Tippets v. Gem State Mutual Life Association, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API