Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Schneider

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1975No. 7182Published

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the master and the superior court, which approved the master’s report, erred in determining the extent of land adversely possessed by the defendant. We believe they did.

This appeal is the second chapter in this controversy. In Richardson v. Schneider, 112 N.H. 475, 298 A.2d 583 (1972), we established a boundary line which gave the Richardsons ownership of a peninsula. The Schneiders had built a camp in 1935 on the peninsula and the master had found that they had acquired title to some portion of the peninsula by adverse possession but could not determine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frew v. DaschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Arfanis v. Claremont National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Adams v. George Mellian & Sun Valley Beach, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  4. Bean v. QuirinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  5. Richardson v. SchneiderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API