Legal Opinion

Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Crooks

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 29, 1930No. 7784PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

This is an action to recover alleged excess taxes in the slim of $18,755.86, paid for the year 1918. Recovery of this amount is sought under and by virtue of the provisions of section 234(a) (14) of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1079), which, so far as is here pertinent, reads as follows:

“At the time of filing return for the taxable year 1918 a taxpayer may file a claim in abatement based on the fact that he has sustained a substantial loss (whether or not actually realized by sale or other disposition) resulting from any material reduction (not due to temporary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Indiana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
  2. H. B. Glover Co. v. BladineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Henningsen Produce Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holley Carburetor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API