Legal Opinion

Pentek v. Pentek

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 18, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The litigants are husband and wife. They are living in a state of separation. The bill is by the husband for a partition of the matrimonial domicile now occupied by the wife and her children by a former marriage. The husband holds a one-third, the wife a two-thirds, interest. When they obtained a marriage license in 1927, both were well past middle life. The defendant was a widow with four grown children, and, without the benefit of clergy, complainant joined them as head of the household. The two built a store and dwelling on two lots, previously purchased by the defendant, to be used for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  2. Schulz v. ZieglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Coudert v. EarlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889
  4. Taylor v. LowencampNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Fulper v. FulperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michalski v. MichalskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Casini v. LuponeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Eberle v. SomonekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Pavy v. PavyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API