Pentek v. Pentek
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The litigants are husband and wife. They are living in a state of separation. The bill is by the husband for a partition of the matrimonial domicile now occupied by the wife and her children by a former marriage. The husband holds a one-third, the wife a two-thirds, interest. When they obtained a marriage license in 1927, both were well past middle life. The defendant was a widow with four grown children, and, without the benefit of clergy, complainant joined them as head of the household. The two built a store and dwelling on two lots, previously purchased by the defendant, to be used for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Schulz v. ZieglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Coudert v. EarlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889
- Taylor v. LowencampNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Fulper v. FulperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michalski v. MichalskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Casini v. LuponeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Eberle v. SomonekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Pavy v. PavyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951