Legal Opinion

Hoggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1997No. 95-1154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

689 So.2d 383 (1997)

Ronnie HOGGINS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-1154.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 26, 1997.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WARNER, Judge.

The issue involved in this appeal is whether a prosecutor may elicit and comment on a defendant's custodial pre-Miranda[1] silence as impeachment when the defendant testifies…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HogginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Ledet v. CampoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Charton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. State, Florida Department of Health v. North Florida Women's Health & Counseling Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Beverly E. Ledet v. John J. Campo, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API